Validated accuracy

Professor's marks vs AssignOwl.

Real assignments, marked by real professors at Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Imperial College London, and Edinburgh, set side by side with what AssignOwl predicted. Toggle each card to compare.

±10%

Every prediction landed within this of the real mark

5/5

Assignments accurately assessed

2.4 pts

Average gap from the professor's score

Philosophy essay, ethical arguments

Philosophy · University of Oxford

-3 pts
Professor's marks for Philosophy essay, ethical arguments

Professor

74%

AssignOwl

71%

Professor

74%

Gap

-3

AI assessment closely matched the professor's evaluation of argument structure and critical analysis.

Computer science, algorithm design

Computer Science · Imperial College London

+3 pts
Professor's marks for Computer science, algorithm design

Professor

58%

AssignOwl

61%

Professor

58%

Gap

+3

Near-perfect alignment in code efficiency and algorithmic complexity assessment.

Biology lab report, cell biology

Biology · University of Cambridge

+1 pts
Professor's marks for Biology lab report, cell biology

Professor

64%

AssignOwl

65%

Professor

64%

Gap

+1

AI detected strong methodology that aligned with the professor's grading criteria.

Business strategy, market analysis

Business · London School of Economics

-4 pts
Professor's marks for Business strategy, market analysis

Professor

68%

AssignOwl

64%

Professor

68%

Gap

-4

Consistent evaluation of data analysis and strategic recommendations.

English literature, Victorian poetry

English · University of Edinburgh

-1 pts
Professor's marks for English literature, Victorian poetry

Professor

65%

AssignOwl

64%

Professor

65%

Gap

-1

AI accurately assessed literary analysis depth and critical interpretation.

See it on your own work.

Upload a draft and get the same honest, professor-grade read, before you submit.

Check your draft, free